One Thinks for Crime Rap control according to science in new society. Eugenics behavior ,genetic engineering 8

One Thinks for Crime Rap control according to science in new society. Eugenics behavior ,genetic engineering 

Eugenics, ek genetic engineering ka part hai jisme yah advice diya gya hai ki hum manaw kalyan ke liye kaise achhe society ka nirmad kar sakte hai. Behavior Selection daura.  Usme btaya gya hai. Ki. Jis insan ke ander Janwer jaise bikar charectere hai.jaise. Crime karna. Rap karna.ye sub.aise logo ka  Genetic charecter hi aisa hota hai. Aur ye bar bar karte hai. Inki aane wali generation bhi aisi hi hogi. To hum aise log ke new generation ko rok kar . Society me aise charecter wale insan ko aane se kyo nhi rok sakte, Ye science khta hai hum her country me aise kanun bna k achha samj bna sakte hai. 

To kyo nhi hum .india se hi suru kare .Rap. Crime aise jo insan ko indar tak hila de. Aise Muljimo gunahgaro. Ko strile.(napunsak) bna ke .aise mansikta wale logo ko Samaj me aane se rok sake.
Isse bura samaj ab kitna hoga... Woman girls ab to child wo jo abhi duniya nhi dekhi inka rap kar diya ja rha. Yaha tak ki janwar ko bhi insan rap kar de rha... Wah re mere samaj.  Aise insan insan khlane ke hakdar nhi hai n is society me rhne ki . Ye log puri society ko gandi society bna diye hai ab to had hi ho gya hai. Aane wale time me log apne ladko ko bhi aise  gunahgaro se bacha  ke rakhenge . Hum kyo aise janwaro ko jinda rhne de rhe . Agar kanun majbur hai to hum nhi hume .aisi situation me kanun se hat kar .kanun hat me lena padega tab kanun ki ankhe khulegi. Aur politics band hoga in sub chijo per

Eugenics , is a set of beliefs and practices that aim to improve the genetic quality of a human population by excluding (through a variety of morallycriticized means) certain genetic groups judged to be inferior, and promoting other genetic groups judged to be superior.The definition of eugenicshas been a matter of debate since the term was coined by Francis Galton in 1883. The concept predates the term; Plato suggested applying the principles of selective breeding to humans around 400 BC.

While eugenic principles have been practiced as early as ancient Greece, the contemporary history of eugenics began in the early 20th century, when a popular eugenics movement emerged in the United Kingdom,^[6] and then spread to many countries, including the United States, Canada,^] and most European countries. In this period, eugenic ideas were espoused across the political spectrum. Consequently, many countries adopted eugenic policies, intended to improve the quality of their populations' genetic stock. Such programs included both positivemeasures, such as encouraging individuals deemed particularly "fit" to reproduce, and negative measures, such as marriage prohibitions and forced sterilization of people deemed unfit for reproduction. Those deemed "unfit to reproduce" often included people with mental or physical disabilities, people who scored in the low ranges on different IQ tests, criminals and "deviants," and members of disfavored minority groups.

The eugenics movement became associated with Nazi Germany and the Holocaust when many of the defendants at the Nuremberg trials attempted to justify their human rights abuses by claiming there was little difference between the Nazi eugenics programs and the U.S. eugenics programs.^[8] In the decades following World War II, with the institution of human rights, many countries gradually began to abandon eugenics policies, although some Western countries, the United States, Canada, and Sweden among them, continued to carry out forced sterilizations.

Since the 1980s and 1990s, with new assisted reproductive technologyprocedures available, such as gestational surrogacy (available since 1985), preimplantation genetic diagnosis (available since 1989), and cytoplasmic transfer (first performed in 1996), fear has emerged about the possible revival of a more potent form of eugenics after decades of promoting human rights.

A major criticism of eugenics policies is that, regardless of whether negative or positive policies are used, they are susceptible to abuse because the genetic selection criteria are determined by whichever group has political power at the time. Furthermore, negative eugenics in particular is criticized by many as a violation of basic human rights, which include the right to reproduce. Another criticism is that eugenics policies eventually lead to a loss of genetic diversity, thereby resulting in inbreeding depression due to a loss of genetic variation. Yet another criticism of contemporary eugenics policies is that they propose to permanently and artificially disrupt millions of years of evolution, and that attempting to create genetic lines "clean" of "disorders" can have far-reaching ancillary downstream effects in the genetic ecology, including negative effects on immunity and species resilience.